Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Schmitz

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2011No. 20100248PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Ronald E. Schmitz, ARRK Investments, Inc. (“ARRK”), and RES Investments, Inc. (“RES”), doing business as Ultimate Transportation, appealed from third and fourth amended judgments awarding Rodney Thompson and Karen Thompson, individually and on behalf of ARRK, half of the value of ARRK’s corporate assets plus pre-judgment interest, attorney’s fees, expenses, and costs, including expert witness fees and interest, in their shareholder derivative action. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] We previously set forth relevant facts in our prior decision in this case, Thompson v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Brandt v. SomervilleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  3. City of Bismarck v. ThomNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Midland Diesel Service & Engine Co. v. SivertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. McColl Farms, LLC v. PflaumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cass County Joint Water Resource District v. EricksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Johnson v. MenardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Lincoln Land Development, LLP v. City of LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  5. N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. SchmitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API