Lockyer v. City and County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceMoreno, J.
I concur. The majority opinion addresses primarily the limitations on the power of local officials to disobey statutes that may be, but have not yet been judicially established to be, unconstitutional. I write separately to focus on the related but distinct question of what courts should do when confronted with such disobedience on the part of local officials. As the majority opinion suggests, a court should not invariably refuse to decide constitutional questions arising from local governments’ or local officials’ refusal to obey purportedly unconstitutional statutes. Indeed, California…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Goodridge v. Department of Public HealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.