Legal Opinion

Bainbridge v. Bainbridge

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1954No. 7956PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

Constance V. Bainbridge, appellant, will hereinafter be referred to as the wife and Emerson M. Bainbridge, respondent, will hereinafter be referred to as the husband.

The trial court, upon application of the husband for modification of a decree of divorce, made and entered an order modifying the decree to exclude all annual payments to the wife. From this order the wife appealed.

The husband, an English citizen, and the wife, a citizen of the United States, each of whom had been previously married were ¡married'to- each-- other- on .December 12, 1938, at Harrison, New York. One…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Holloway v. HollowayOhio Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Schnerr v. SchnerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Noble v. FisherIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Spencer-Steed v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Application of MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API