Bainbridge v. Bainbridge
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
Constance V. Bainbridge, appellant, will hereinafter be referred to as the wife and Emerson M. Bainbridge, respondent, will hereinafter be referred to as the husband.
The trial court, upon application of the husband for modification of a decree of divorce, made and entered an order modifying the decree to exclude all annual payments to the wife. From this order the wife appealed.
The husband, an English citizen, and the wife, a citizen of the United States, each of whom had been previously married were ¡married'to- each-- other- on .December 12, 1938, at Harrison, New York. One…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Holloway v. HollowayOhio Supreme Court · 1935
- Baxter v. BaxterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Schnerr v. SchnerrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Phillips v. PhillipsIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
- Noble v. FisherIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Spencer-Steed v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
- Application of MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.