Legal Opinion

Lebrecht v. Union Indemnity Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1933No. 5940PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWernette, J.

The essential facts necessary for the determination of this case are substantially as follows: Respondent, L. G. Lebrecht, had been engaged in the potato business at Kansas City for many years. During the year of 1930 Yern W. Hise, of Idaho Falls, acted as his agent in Idaho for the purpose of buying potatoes. Frank J. Fowler and J. T. Stanger were a copartnership, doing business in the vicinity of Jerome, Idaho, under the firm name and style of Fowler & Stanger, hereafter designated as brokers. During the potato season of 1930, respondent purchased from said brokers fifty-five carloads of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HolderIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Gallafent v. TuckerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Steinour v. Oakley State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Weaver v. RambowIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Turner v. Roseberry Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Keenan v. PriceIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. J.R. Simplot Company, Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Idaho Gold Dredging Co. v. BalderstonIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  4. State v. HochIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. GrosecloseIdaho Supreme Court · 1946

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API