Legal Opinion
Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1952No. 4277_1PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The Reconstruction Finance Corporation, as successor to the Defense Supplies Corporation, brought this action against the Stanolind Pipe Line Company, to recover $134,252.00 paid by the Defense Supplies Corporation to Stanolind (now Service Pipe Line Company) as subsidy on oil purchased by Stanolind from the Continental Oil Company, in thé Montague Oil Field of Texas, from August 1944 to November 1946.
Within the framework of the pleadings, it is agreed that on June 28, 1944, the director of the Office of Economic Stabilization issued a valid directive to the Director of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bowles v. WillinghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lockerty v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Woods v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Utah Junk Co. v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Bass. Bass v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- United States v. Frank L. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Service Pipe Line Company, a Corporation v. Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1954
- United States v. BeardDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.