Legal Opinion

Utah Junk Co. v. Porter

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 22, 1946No. 400PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

This is one of a series of cases calling for the construction of amendments to the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942.

Section 203 of that Act, 56 Stat. 23, 31; 50 U. S. C. App. § 923, confined within narrow limits the right to protest to the Administrator against a price schedule promulgated by him. The Stabilization Act of 1944, 58 Stat. 632, 638; 50 U. S. C. App. § 923, greatly liberalized this right to protest. The view taken by the United States Emergency Court of Appeals of the scope of this liberalization, 150 F. 2d 963, based on its prior ruling in Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. Bowles,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. HarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Thomas Paper Stock Co. v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. United States Gypsum Co. v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Marlene Linens v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Cheng Fan Kwok v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Fleming v. Mohawk Wrecking & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Allen v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Carl Norman Quinn v. Earl L. Butz, Secretary of Agriculture, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API