Legal Opinion
United States v. Frank L. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 1, 1958No. 15505PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought by the United States to recapture meat subsidy payments which were made to defendant, Frank L. Smith, in 1945. The trial court directed a verdict for defendant. The government moved for an order setting aside the verdict and for judgment in its favor. In doing so, it suggested that the court might stay execution of the judgment, if entered for the government, to enable defendant to obtain a hearing before the United States Emergency Court of Appeals. Without passing on this motion, the court entered judgment for defendant on the verdict.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Woods v. HillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Rabkin v. BowlesEmergency Court of Appeals · 1944
- Safeway Stores v. BrownEmergency Court of Appeals · 1943
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Service Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leda Anderson, a Married Person v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Robinson v. SalazarDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Clackamas Meat Company, Inc., an Oregon Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Frank L. Smith v. Franklin Floete, Administrator, General Services Administration, Successor to Reconstruction Finance CorporationEmergency Court of Appeals · 1959