Legal Opinion

Rayford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 24, 2018No. CR–96–428PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCourtney Hudson Goodson, Associate Justice

Petitioner Larry Rayford, who was convicted in 1994 of capital murder, brings this pro se petition to reinvest jurisdiction in the trial court to consider a petition for writ of error coram nobis. It is the fourth such petition filed by Rayford in this court.1 In the petition and an amendment that he filed to it, Rayford contends that he is entitled to issuance of the writ by the trial court on the ground that he has recently learned that Dr. W.R. Oglesby was not a disinterested person at the time Dr. Oglesby gave his opinion that Rayford was competent to stand trial. Rayford argues that Dr.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  3. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. State v. LarimoreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Green v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Osburn v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2018
  2. Martin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  3. Charles Edward Jones v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Ralph Malone v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
  5. Tyrun Lamont JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API