Schnerb v. Holt Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtHough, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The “British claim,” as pleaded, is for a commission. Plaintiffs asserted themselves to have been the procuring cause of defendant’s getting large orders from the government of Great Britain. We shall assume that either in the complaint or by amendment at trial the cause of action was properly set forth as a demand for the compensation of a broker. It is enough to say that we entirely agree with the lower court that no evidence was given sufficient to take the case to the jury. Of the other claims it is to. be noted that both rest in terms on the tentative…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
- Ohio Valley Pulley Works, Inc. v. Oneida Steel Pulley Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Shoninger Bros. v. Dormer Bros.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
3Cited by3 opinions
- Joring v. HarrissCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Schnerb v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Schnerb v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928