Hart v. Stevens
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, District Judge.
This is a rule to show cause why judgment should not be granted for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action is assumpsit brought to recover an amount alleged to be due the plaintiff on a note given by defendant, a married woman, to the Union National Bank of Scranton, Pennsylvania.
The pleadings consist of a statement of claim, an affidavit of defense pleading new matter, a reply to new matter and a petition for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, upon which the rule now under consideration was granted.
It is well settled that plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Hess v. Merion Title & Trust Co. of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Odessa Independent Beneficial Assn. v. Stechert B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Farrell v. North Scranton Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
3Cited by1 opinion
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Harrisburg Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938