Legal Opinion

Hart v. Stevens

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1938No. 4104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This is a rule to show cause why judgment should not be granted for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The action is assumpsit brought to recover an amount alleged to be due the plaintiff on a note given by defendant, a married woman, to the Union National Bank of Scranton, Pennsylvania.

The pleadings consist of a statement of claim, an affidavit of defense pleading new matter, a reply to new matter and a petition for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense, upon which the rule now under consideration was granted.

It is well settled that plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sears v. BirbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Hess v. Merion Title & Trust Co. of ArdmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Odessa Independent Beneficial Assn. v. Stechert B. & L. Assn.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Farrell v. North Scranton Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. Harrisburg Trust Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API