Legal Opinion

Oswianza v. Wengler & Mandell, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 15, 1934No. Gen. No. 37,163Published

1Opinion

Supplemental Opinion Upon Petition for Rehearing.

The attorneys for the defendant have filed a petition earnestly requesting a rehearing, which prompts some further observations.

What is the effect on negotiability of a provision in the instrument limiting the right of the holder to sue in his own name? In Pflueger v. Broadway Trust & Savings Bank, 265 Ill. App. 569-581, is presented the view that such a provision is so contrary and repugnant to the essence of the instrument that it is void, citing a large number of supporting cases.

There are also a considerable number of cases which tend to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Paepcke v. PaineMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Cella v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  4. Sturgis National Bank v. Harris Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Moody v. Morris-Roberts Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API