Legal Opinion

Brinckley v. Sager

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On July 21, 1934, plaintiffs obtained a judgment of foreclosure for the sum of $2,796.75, damages and costs. The amount of the unpaid taxes was not included in the judgment. The amount due for taxes does not appear. There is no bill of exceptions. A foreclosure sale was had of the mortgaged premises on September 18, 1935. Plaintiffs bid in the property at this sale for the sum of $1,600. They then moved for a confirmation of the sale and for a judgment for the deficiency in the sum of $1,429.79. It appears that upon the hearing some testimony was offered as tO' the market value of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Kremer v. RuleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Weimer v. UthusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Michigan Trust Co. v. DutmersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Big Bay Realty Co. v. RosenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Wisconsin National Bank v. KSW Investments Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Citizens Bank of Sheboygan v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Rio-Fall River Union Bank v. HollnagelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Welfare Building & Loan Ass'n v. GearhardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API