Citizens Bank of Sheboygan v. Rose

It is first argued by the Roses that the findings of value are inconsistent and therefore require reversal. This may be so excepting that if the judgment is correct on the evidence, it should be affirmed. We do not think the same theory of evaluation must apply to all three parcels. Priewe v. Fitzsimons & Connell Co. (1930), 117 Wis. 497, 511, 94 N. W. 317. We take the appellants’ argument to be that there is insufficient evidence to sustain the evaluations confirmed.

In the case of the Clark farm, two witnesses for the bank appraised the farm at $28,500, whereas it sold for $51,000. The Roses…