Legal Opinion

Kremer v. Rule

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

This is the second appeal to arise in this action. The first appeal' was from that part of the judgment which appointed a receiver. That judgment was affirmed. Kremer v. Crase, 209 Wis. 183, 244 N. W. 596. After the expiration of the one-year period of redemption, pursuant to due notice of sale, the premises were struck off to the plaintiffs for $10,000. Upon the application of the plaintiffs to confirm that sale, a hearing purporting to comply with the rules approved in Suring State Bank v. Giese, 210 Wis. 489, 246 N. W. 556, was held for the purpose of determining whether the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Michigan Trust Co. v. CodyMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Maxon v. GatesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Milwaukee Trust Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. DutmersMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. First Wisconsin National Bank v. KSW Investments Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. BidingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Weimer v. UthusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Big Bay Realty Co. v. RosenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Wahl v. H. W. & S. M. Tullgren, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API