Legal Opinion

Charter Operators v. Blank

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 24, 2012No. 11-cv-00664 (RCL)PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pacific Halibut are a highly desired catch off the coast of Southeast Alaska. Through the National Marine Fisheries Service (“NMFS”), the Secretary of Commerce (“Secretary”) has issued a formal rule (“Final Rule”) creating a limited access system1 for charter vessels engaged *125in guided sport fishery for halibut in a designated area in the Central Gulf of Alaska. See Fed.Reg. 554 (adopted Jan. 5, 2010; effective Feb. 1, 2010); 50 C.F.R. §§ 300.61, 300.66, 300.67. The plaintiffs, Charter Operators of Alaska,2 allege that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brodie v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  2. Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of CanadaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America (Naca) v. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Air Transp. Ass'n of Am., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. ['ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER v. SEBELIUS']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API