Legal Opinion
Martin v. Cestone
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 3, 1954PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 267 (1954)
110 A.2d 54
BROOKS C. MARTIN, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWN OF BLOOMFIELD, NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
ANTHONY CESTONE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 15, 1954.
Decided December 3, 1954.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. David A. Rappeport argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Thomas J. Markey, attorney).
Mr. Murray A. Laiks argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Heller & Laiks, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CLAPP, S.J.A.D.
The issue here involving the law of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Gilfillan's PermitSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Chayt v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Lumund v. Bd. of Adjustment of the Borough of RutherfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Town of Billerica v. QuinnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Cobble Close Farm v. Bd. of Adjustment, Middletown Tp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Town of Belleville v. Parrillo's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Ardolino v. Florham Park Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Heagen v. Borough of AllendaleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
- Moore v. Bridgewater Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Wolf v. Zoning Bd. of Adjust. of Park RidgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.