Legal Opinion

State v. Rewolinski

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1990No. 88-2312-CRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The issues in this case are several:(1) Does a criminal defendant bear the burden of establishing both that he manifested a subjective expec*7tation of privacy that was allegedly invaded by government action and that that expectation was legitimate?(2) Did the defendant have a legitimate expectation of privacy in the conversations or in the TDD1 printout tape that recorded those conversations when his call to the victim, Catherine Teeters, and the victim's call to him occurred while he was in the dispatch area of the sheriff department's office, using the sheriff department's TDD, in the…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. State v. AgnelloWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. OwensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. WhitrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API