Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1999No. 97-0925-CR, 97-0926-CRPublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶1. These cases are before the court on certification by the court of appeals, pursuant to Wis. Stat. § (Rule) 809.61 (1995-96). Police officers investigating a homicide interviewed Tonnie D. Armstrong (Armstrong) at the county jail, where Armstrong was serving time for an unrelated offense. Armstrong made oral statements incriminating himself in the homicide. At the end of the interview, the officers administered the Miranda warnings 2 to Armstrong for the first time. About two hours later, they presented Armstrong with a written statement memorializing the earlier unwarned statements.…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. State v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. GuthrieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Jones v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. Angelica C. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API