Legal Opinion

Li v. Feldt

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1992No. Docket Nos. 91079, 92057, (Calendar Nos. 1-2)PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AFTER SECOND REMAND

Cavanagh, C.J.

We revisit in these cases the issue of the existence and scope of exceptions to governmental immunity from tort liability under MCL 691.1407(1); MSA 3.996(107X1). We hold that there is no public nuisance exception to governmental immunity, and that, to whatever extent a nuisance per se exception may exist, it is not implicated by the facts of either case before us.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. LI v FELDT

Plaintiff Chen Li was injured in an automobile *463collision on May 5, 1983, which was allegedly caused, in part, by an improperly timed traffic light operated…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Hadfield v. Oakland County Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. PickensMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Kent County Aeronautics Board v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. Summers v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Ramik v. Darling International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  5. McDowell v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API