Legal Opinion

Ramik v. Darling International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 10, 2001No. Civ. 98-40276, Civ. 98-40439PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court are the following motions: the Ramik Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Liability; Plaintiff City of Melvindale’s Motion for Summary Judgment as to Liability; and Plaintiff City of Melvindale’s Motion for Rule 65 Injunctive Relief. For reasons stated below, this Court denies Plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and Plaintiff City of Melvindale’s motion for a preliminary injunction.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Defendant Darling International, Inc. owns and operates a “rendering” plant in the City of Melvindale.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Sampson v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo & Co. v. WhenU. Com, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  2. Amphion, Inc. v. Buckeye Electric Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  3. Kelly Services, Inc. v. NorettoDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2007
  4. Bowens v. Aftermath EntertainmentDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. American Civil Liberties Union Fund v. Livingston CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API