Legal Opinion
Namm v. Charles E. Frosst & Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1981PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
178 N.J. Super. 19 (1981)
427 A.2d 1121
GAIL NAMM AND PAUL NAMM, HER HUSBAND, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES E. FROSST AND CO., INC., LAKESIDE LABS, A DIVISION OF COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO., AYERST MCKENNA AND HARRISON LTD., S.P. DURST AND CO. INC., METROPOLITAN LABS, INC., A DIVISION OF MICHIGAN CHEMICAL CORP., DRUG PRODUCTS COMPANY, HARROWER LABS INC., WINTHROP PRODUCTS, A DIVISION OF STERLING DRUG INC., SCHIEFFELIN CO., DIFCO LABS INC., KREMERS-URBAN CO., BUFFINGTONS INC., RAYMER PHARMACAL CO., LEDERLE LABS, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYNAMID CO., PRO-MEDICO LABS INC., PITMAN-MOORE CO., A DIVISION…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Summers v. TiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Scanlon v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Anderson v. SombergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Ferrigno v. Eli Lilly and Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1984
- Burnside v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Martin v. Abbott LaboratoriesWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Coyle v. Englander'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.