Legal Opinion

High Sierra Rural Alliance v. Cnty. of Plumas

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided October 19, 2018No. C082315PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHoch, J.

*106Encompassing more than 1.67 million acres, Plumas County (County) is geographically *878large. As a matter of population, however, the County is small - with only 20,007 residents. The County's population actually shrank during the decade between 2000 and 2010, when it experienced a net loss of 817 residents. Little future population growth is expected. The California Department of Finance has estimated the County's population will remain under 21,000 until 2025, at which point the population is expected to *107decline . This minimal expected population growth serves as a backdrop to the County's…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lungren v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Contreras-Velazquez v. Family Health Centers of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Contreras-Velazquez v. Family Health Centers of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. East Oakland Stadium Alliance, LLC v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Getzels v. The State Bar of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Getzels v. The State Bar of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2025

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API