Legal Opinion

Schlottman v. Pressey Pressey v. Schlottman

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 17, 1952No. 4325_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs bought approximately 2,000 feet of 6% inch O D 17 pound used oil well casing from the defendants at $2.00 per foot. They brought this action to recover damages resulting from the collapse of the casing in an oil well which was drilled by them in South Dakota. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found the damages claimed were the direct and proximate result of the failure of defendants to deliver oil well casing of the weight purchased but applied a rule of damages which permitted the recovery of only nominal compensation. Both parties have appealed.

Th…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Boylston Housing Corp. v. O'TooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  4. Twachtman v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  5. Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Palmer v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Davis Cattle Co., Inc. v. Great Western Sugar CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
  3. United Protective Workers v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. United Protective Workers Of America, Local No. 2 v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  5. Tenneco Oil Company v. Henry W. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API