Kensington Partners, LLC v. Beal Bank Nevada
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFADDEN, Judge.
This appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting summary judgment to Beal Bank Nevada on its suit on a promissory note and personal guaranties. Because there are no genuine issues of material fact, we affirm.
“ ‘Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review the grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the evidence in favor of the nonmovant.’ [Cit.]” Core LaVista, LLC v. Cumming, 308 Ga. App. 791 (709 SE2d 336) (2011). So viewed, the evidence shows that on May 25, 2006,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Imaging Systems International, Inc. v. Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Schroeder v. Hunter Douglas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Aycock v. CalkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Core LaVista, LLC v. CummingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Hazel v. Tharpe & Brooks, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bobick v. Community & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- Ware v. Multibank 2009-1 RES-ADC Venture, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Cumberland Contractors, Inc. v. State Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Greenstein v. Bank of OzarksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- HARVEY v. MERCHANSupreme Court of Georgia · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.