Legal Opinion

Thrasher v. Lustig

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 10, 1963No. Record 5572PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtF Anson, J.

Wayne Lustig, ancillary administrator c.t.a. of the estate of Herbert Maxwell Thrasher, Sr., deceased, appellee herein, filed a bill in equity against Herbert Maxwell Thrasher, Jr., the appellant, praying for the cancellation of that portion of a contract entered into between Thrasher, Sr., his wife, Beulah Mae Thrasher, and the appellant, under which Thrasher, Sr., transferred 120 shares of the capital stock of Greenbrier Farms, Inc., and 361! shares of the capital stock ofGreenbrier Farms Holding Corporation to appellant. It was alleged that Thrasher, Sr., was mentally incompetent and/or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burgess v. TrevathanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Holt v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. McDaniel v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1956
  4. Lancaster v. LancasterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  5. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Alliance to Save the Mattaponi v. Virginia Marine Resources CommissinCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  3. Tesla, Inc. v. Virginia Automobile Dealers AssociationCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2018
  4. Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. VIRGINIA MARINE RESOURCES COMMISSIONCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2004
  5. Commonwealth v. F. F.Wise & Norton County Circuit Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API