Legal Opinion

Bell v. Mulkey

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1929No. 1224-5243PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

NICKEES, J.

Bell and Clift (doing business in name of “Western Silo Company”) sued Mulkey alleging, in substance: (a) That Mulkey on October 9, 1913, “for value received, in keeping with his written contract ' theretofore made on September 12th, 1913,” executed and delivered to them a promissory note for the principal sum of $475, payable November 1, 1914, and providing for interest and a “reasonable attorney’s fee”; (b) payment of the note, though demanded, has been refused; (c) September 12, 1913, they “sold and delivered” (at “Chillicothe, Texas”) to Mulkey “the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Thomas v. HammondTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Jones & Carey v. RisleyTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Lanius v. v. ShuberTexas Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Traders & General Ins. Co. v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Schelb v. SparenbergCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Ross v. StinnettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Gulf Casualty Co. v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. McMichael v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API