Lanius v. v. Shuber
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Olay. Tried below before Hon. B. F. Williams. A. K. Swan and J. G. Chesnutt, for appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
note.
The defendant Lanius pleaded under oath that the only consideration for the note was an offer made by plaintiff through an agent to lend him the amount of money recited in the note; that the note was signed and delivered to the agent of plaintiff for the purpose of being submitted to plaintiff for his approval before it was delivered, but the money was never furnished and defendant was notified through said agent that the note was not accepted.
Defendant Houston answered that the note was given by Lanius as principal for borrowed money, and that he signed the note…
2Cited by23 opinions
- Alexander v. HagedornTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Town North National Bank v. BroaddusTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Chalk v. DaggettTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Adams v. First Nat. Bank of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Bell v. MulkeyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.