Legal Opinion

Schelb v. Sparenberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 1, 1937No. 13600PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendants in error, Charles and Russell Sparenberg, grandsons of H. Sparenberg and Johanna Sparenberg, after the death of their grandmother (their grandfather having died many years before), brought suit against their aunt, Mrs. Lizzie Schelb and her husband, who are plaintiffs in error, to establish and recover an undivided one-half interest in all property belonging to the estate of their said grandparents and also to set aside and deny the right to the probate of a certain will purported to have been executed by Mrs. Johanna Sparenberg; and the two causes, being lodged in the same…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Stillman v. HirschTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Electric Express & Baggage Co. v. AblonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Woodbury v. WoodburyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  4. Holt v. GuerguinTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Craycroft v. CrawfordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Le Sage v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Schelb v. SparenbergTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Fenner v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Hassell v. PrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Sparenberg v. LattimoreTexas Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API