Legal Opinion

In Re Tulio

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 8, 1990No. 19-11638PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.

The Debtor’s landlord appears to contend that the instant contested matter presents an issue of the impact of the failure of a debtor-tenant to assume a non-residential realty lease, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 365(d)(4), upon a motion by a landlord for relief from the automatic stay to recover possession of non-residential realty of a Chapter 13 debtor-tenant. We conclude that, at this juncture, the Landlord has not properly raised the issue of the ramifications of § 365(d)(4) upon this scenario, and therefore, we will continue the automatic stay in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Pugh v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. In Re CromptonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. In Re T.F.P. Resources, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  5. Whitt v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Whitt)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Car-Gill, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. In Re HinchliffeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API