Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Curran
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 15, 1975No. Civ. A. 75-400, 75-520PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LUONGO, District Judge.
Various defendants have filed motions to dismiss in Civil Action 75-400 and in Civil Action 75-520. These cases are the latest in a series filed by pro se plaintiff Paul Meyer arising out of litigation in Schuylkill County. (See earlier opinions of this court in Meyer v. Lavelle, 64 F.R.D. 533 (E.D.Pa.1974) and 389 F.Supp. 972 (E.D.Pa.1975)). A brief history of the previous litigation which provides the backdrop for the present actions will be helpful to an understanding of the present motions.
BACKGROUND
Meyer, a plumbing contractor, defaulted on a contract in…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John T. Henry and Evelyn I. Henry v. Farmer City State Bank, an Illinois Banking Corporation, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Boileau v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Baer v. BaerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Boddorff v. Publicker Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Teleprompter of Erie, Inc. v. City of ErieDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.