Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Wiltse

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1953No. 35,911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, William Palmer, was injured while employed by defendant, Merle Wiltse, as a farm hand. A fellow employee dropped two bales of hay down a hay chute onto plaintiff while he was engaged in preparing to feed a span of horses in defendant’s barn. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence, the trial court granted defendant’s motion for dismissal. Subsequently, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, and judgment was entered in favor of defendant. This appeal is from that judgment.

It appears that plaintiff was working about defendant’s barn with another…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Liptak v. KarsnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Johnson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bigham v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Erickson v. Van Web Equipment CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Hacker v. BerknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Lende v. Lende Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API