Legal Opinion

H. W. Gossard Co. v. Loeber's, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 1940No. 6995PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Appellee charged Loeber’s, Inc., with infringement of two patents to Cunningham, numbered respectively 1,859,198 and 1,899,-890. They are referred to hereafter as the first and second Cunningham patents.

Shortly thereafter appellants filed a suit in the same District Court to restrain appellee from prosecution of the first suit, or any other patent infringement suit based on the first Cunningham patent. These cases were consolidated for hearing, and the District Court held both patents valid and infringed. The same decree denied the relief sought in the second suit, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Loeber Hair Goods Co. v. H. W. Gossard Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Burgh v. KINDEL FURNITURE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
  2. Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
  3. Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
  4. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  5. Reynolds v. EmausDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API