Legal Opinion

Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 11, 1982No. Appeals, No. 1524 C.D. 1980 and No. 1525 C.D. 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Mr. & Mrs. Riehl and Mr. & Mrs. Seip (collectively Appellants) are adjoining property owners in Mill-creek Township (Township). The Millcreek Township Sewer Authority (Authority) has constructed sewer lines in the Township and has assessed Appellants’ lots for the cost thereof on a front foot basis. Appellants refused to pay the assessments whereupon Authority filed municipal claims. A scire facias issued on the claims pursuant to which appropriate pleadings were filed followed by a non-jury trial wherein all municipal claims against Appellants were consolidated. At…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer Township Municipal Sewer Authority v. WittySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Upper Gwynedd Township Authority v. CaltabianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Highland Sewer & Water Authority v. EngelbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Palmer Township Municipal Sewer Authority v. WittyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Upper Gwynedd Township Authority v. RothCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Seip v. Millcreek Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API