Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge MacPhail,
Mr. & Mrs. Riehl and Mr. & Mrs. Seip (collectively Appellants) are adjoining property owners in Mill-creek Township (Township). The Millcreek Township Sewer Authority (Authority) has constructed sewer lines in the Township and has assessed Appellants’ lots for the cost thereof on a front foot basis. Appellants refused to pay the assessments whereupon Authority filed municipal claims. A scire facias issued on the claims pursuant to which appropriate pleadings were filed followed by a non-jury trial wherein all municipal claims against Appellants were consolidated. At…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Palmer Township Municipal Sewer Authority v. WittySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Upper Gwynedd Township Authority v. CaltabianoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Highland Sewer & Water Authority v. EngelbachSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Palmer Township Municipal Sewer Authority v. WittyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Upper Gwynedd Township Authority v. RothCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Seip v. Millcreek Township SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988