Legal Opinion

Highland Sewer & Water Authority v. Engelbach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 17, 1966No. Appeal, No. 58PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, P. J.,

The only question presented by this appeal is whether a municipal authority may assess the cost of constructing a sanitary sewer according to the foot front rule where the sewer is placed in an unopened street and where the lot is benefited by the sewer. The court below held that it could not, because the street was not a public street and therefore “the assessment is illegal and void.” We cannot agree with this conclusion.

On March 30, 1963, appellant filed a municipal lien against the property of appellees situate in Geistown Borough, Cambria County. That property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Simon AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. O'Donnell v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Boyer v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Bridgeville Borough v. ValsiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Independent Enterprises Inc. Thomas Lozecki v. Pittsburgh Water and Sewer Authority City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Riehl v. Millcreek Township Sewer AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. White Rock Sewage Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Palmer Township Municipal Sewer Authority v. WittyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. East Hempfield Township v. LancasterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API