Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District v. Adams

California Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1942No. L. A. 17511PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK, J. —

This is a motion to set aside an order granting a petition for a rehearing in the above entitled cause and to direct the issuance of a remittitur forthwith.

The proceeding is one in eminent domain. A judgment in condemnation was entered by the Superior Court in Riverside County. On appeal by the plaintiff district the judgment was reversed by the District Court of Appeal. (99 Pac. (2d) 659.) A petition by the defendants to have the cause heard in this court was granted and it was thereupon transferred to this court for hearing and determination. The ap peal was first argued at Los…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Garrison v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. People v. RuefCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. King v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. People v. CastelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Rubenstein v. RubensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API