Legal Opinion

Jones v. Flour City Ornamental Iron Works

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 15, 1965No. 39395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nelson, Justice.

Certiorari upon the relation of Flour City Ornamental Iron Works, hereinafter called employer, and Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, its compensation insurer, to review an order of the Industrial Commission granting a petition to vacate an award upon reconsideration of the petition by the commission.

Edward Jones, the employee, was bom in 1905. The record discloses little of his background except that in 1953 he lost the sight of his left eye. Although he later made a claim that the loss was occupational in origin, it was determined that it was the result of glaucoma.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  4. Bomersine v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Jacobson v. Uptown Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schoepke v. Alexander Smith & Sons Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Mattson v. AbateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Radzak v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Turner v. Federal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  5. Gran v. City of St. Paul, Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API