Legal Opinion

In re Barton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Original petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Tbe opinion states tbe facts.

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, J.:

Tbe case, as stated in tbe petition, is that tbe petitioner was on tbe thirteenth day of April, 1888, twice indicted by tbe grand jury of tbe third district court; that both indictments were found and presented at tbe same time; that tbe names indorsed on each, as witnesses, were tbe same; that one charged him with the crime of adultery, alleged to have been committed with one Mary Busley; that tbe other charged him with tbe crime of unlawful cohabitation, alleged to have been committed by living with Mary Barton and Mary Busley as bis wives; that tbe indictment for adultery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Chouteau v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. In re BogartU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1873
  4. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Ex Parte KaufmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BarnesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ex Parte DixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  3. Ex Parte OhlNevada Supreme Court · 1939
  4. State v. BohnUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. SteedCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API