Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ohl

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1939No. 3274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Ducker, J.:

This is an original proceeding in habeas corpus. The petition shows that petitioner was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Reno on a charge of driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated. From the judgment of the municipal court, petitioner appealed to the Second judicial district court. He was tried in the latter court without a jury, found guilty, and sentenced to thirty days confinement in the Reno city jail and fined $300. He was immediately imprisoned in said jail.

Matters wherein it is claimed that petitioner’s imprisonment is illegal are also…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ex parte WinstonNevada Supreme Court · 1873
  2. In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ex parte DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. HatfieldWashington Supreme Court · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brooks v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Oswald v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In re BanschbachMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Application of AlexanderNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ex Parte McKayNevada Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API