Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Dixon
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided June 8, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATWOOD, 0. J.
Petitioners Charles Dixon, Carroll Krepps, George Eccarclt and George Brown seek release by the Habeas Corpus Act from the custody of Leslie Rudolph, Warden of the Missouri State Penitentiary.
Issuance and service of the writ and production of the bodies of petitioners were Avaived, and the warden filed return stating that he holds each of the petitioners under and by virtue of two commitments issued by the Circuit Court of Grundy County, Missouri, on November 30, 1929, at the November, 1929, term thereof, and by a commitment issued by the Circuit Court of Livingston County,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spies v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Gaines v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- People v. . CignaraleNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Gue v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Simmons v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Nixon v. JaynesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
- State v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State Ex Rel. Lovejoy v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.