People v. Fortch
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. William P. Lawlor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.
Defendant was charged, by information, filed in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, with practicing dentistry without a license in said city and county, in violation of the so-called “dentistry act,” as amended in 1909 (Stats. 1909, p. 800). Upon his trial he was found guilty, and is now before this court upon his appeal from the judgment of conviction and the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The principal point relied on for a reversal of the judgment is that the superior court had no original jurisdiction of the offense charged. The offense is punishable by a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Boo Doo HongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Graham v. Mayor & Bd. of Trs. of FresnoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Robert v. Police Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. YeggeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. FreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. OsakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. QuarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.