Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Riley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. M. F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

The appellant, Benjamin A. Stokes, exhibited his bill in the circuit court of Cook county, against George E. Biley, Henry H. Gage, Asahel Gage, and others, praying for the partition of certain lots in the city of Chicago. It is alleged in the bill that the complainant is the owner in fee of an undivided two-thirds interest in the lots, and that defendant Biley is the owner of the remaining third; that they derive title through an attachment sale and sheriff’s deed, from Taylor V. Ward, the former owner of the premises. It is further alleged that Henry H. Gage and Asahel Gage have, or claim to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rupert v. MarkIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
  2. City of Chicago v. WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Redfern v. SullivanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Reed v. EastinIllinois Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Anthony v. WheelerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. McDougal v. LameOregon Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API