Legal Opinion
Redfern v. Sullivan
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided February 4, 1983No. 4-82-0336PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mills
We deal here with res judicata, injunctive relief, and possession to farmland.
It’s a mixed bag: affirmed in part and reversed in part.
But first — the procedural facts.
Redfern brought an action seeking injunctive relief or, in the alternative, damages for breach of an oral lease of certain farmland. He alleged that defendants are the owners of a tract of farmland and that he is in possession of this tract. He alleged that W. Paul Sullivan, acting as agent for the defendants, entered into an oral lease of this farmland with him. He agreed to provide machinery, equipment, and labor for the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Morris v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Illinois State Chamber of Commerce v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Addison Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Parkway Bank & Trust v. City of DarienAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- In the Matter of ENERGY COOPERATIVE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Torcasso v. Standard Outdoor Sales, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Jones v. City of AltonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sadat v. American Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.