Legal Opinion

Rupert v. Mark

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 20 opinions

This cause was heard before Davis, Judge, at May term, 1853, of the Tazewell Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.

This was an action of ejectment, brought by Rupert and Haines against Mark, on the 7th of April, 1851, to recover the possession of a lot in the town of Pekin.

On the trial, the plaintiffs, introduced the following evidence. 1. Proof that David Bailey was the owner of the lot in question, on the 15th of July, 1831; and that the defendant had possession thereof when the suit was commenced. 2. A deed of the lot from David Bailey to Samuel G. Bailey, bearing date the 15th of July, 1831, and recorded on the 18th of the same month. 3. Proof that Samuel G. Bailey died intestate in the year 1846,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Jackson ex dem. HillsCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  2. Norcross v. WidgeryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  3. McCaskle v. AmarineSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Ballance v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Boling v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1839

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. NicrosiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. German-American National Bank v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Truesdale v. FordIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Struve v. TatgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Jackson, Lansing & Saginaw Railroad v. DavisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API