Legal Opinion
United States v. Zak
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided May 14, 2007No. CR 06-30011-MAPPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM REGARDING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS
(Dkt. No. 49)
PONSOR, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In an Information dated May 26, 2006, the government charged Defendant Michael J. Zak, Jr. with five misdemeanors: pursuing, hunting, taking, attempting to take, and attempting to kill great blue herons without permission in violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 703 and 707(a), (Count One); pursuing, hunting, taking, attempting to take, and attempting to kill ospreys without permission in violation…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. X-Citement Video, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2017
- WildEarth Guardians v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- URI Student Senate v. Town of NarragansettDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
- Friends of the Boundary Mountains v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2014
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. U.S. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.