WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
Honorable David C. Bury, United States District Judge *787The Court grants in part and denies in part the Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds the McKittrick policy is arbitrary and capricious, an abuse of discretion and otherwise not in accordance with law in violation of the APA. Therefore, the Court grants summary judgment for Plaintiffs under the APA. The Court finds that solely for the purpose of Section 7 of the ESA the Mexican gray wolf is treated as a species proposed to be listed, not as a threatened species. Therefore, the Court denies summary judgment for Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Brian CharetteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Arizona Medical Billing Incorporated v. FSIX LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Kennedy v. Mohave, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.