Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Runyan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1925No. 16396. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

Adah W. Eeeney, the residuary legatee and devisee under the will of Williamina Chalifoux, deceased, filed her bill in the superior court of Cook county alleging that she is the owner of a lot improved with a flat-building, known as No. 2438 West Chicago avenue, Chicago, and a lot improved with a dwelling in the village of Arlington Heights; that these lands were devised to her by the will of Mrs. Chalifoux; that prior to the death of testatrix Daniel B. Williams, appellant, was the business manager and confidential adviser of testatrix; that in violation of the confidence reposed in him,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. WhitneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Dowie v. DriscollIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Warner v. FlackIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Higgins v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Rolikatis v. LovettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duncan v. DazeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Schueler v. BlomstrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Rogers v. BartonIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Howard v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Omega Investment Co. v. WoolleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API