Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Hershey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1889PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Shiawassee. (Newton, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The declaration in this case contains a special count and the common counts in assumpsit. The special count sets out that about the year 1873 defendant became and was agent of William Perkins, deceased, for *506loaning money in Shiawassee and adjoining counties, and about July, 1873,- defendant received $800 to loan to one Leander Merrill, of Chesaning, Saginaw county, which about that date he loaned to said Merrill upon his note, taking as collateral 'security a mortgage to said William Perkins upon certain saw-mill property; that the interest was regularly paid by defendant, Hershey, to Perkins…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Stewart v. JeromeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Gower v. StuartMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Spencer Co-operative Live Stock Shipping Ass'n v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Michigan Slate Co. v. Iron Range & Huron Bay RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Home Undertakers, Inc. v. Bristow Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Great Western Coal Co. v. Chicago G. W. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API