Stewart v. Jerome
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion
1Opinion of the CourtChampuin, J.
This suit was commenced by declaration which consisted of the common counts in assumpsit.
The defendant demanded a bill of particulars, and one was served, which consisted of several items from May 2 to June 5, 1884, of oats, amounting to $395.66, and a statement that the goods were sold and delivered to Joseph H. Morris for feed for his livery horses at his stables on Michigan Grand avenue at Detroit.
That said Morris owed defendant $10,000, and to secure the same defendant held a chattel mortgage on Morris’ horses, harnesses, and other property in said stables, dated June 4, 1884; that said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- White v. . RintoulNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Calkins v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Furbish v. GoodnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Mine & Smelter Supply Co. v. Stockgrowers' BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
- Perkins v. HersheyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Goodman v. FelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Draggo v. West Bay City Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.