Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Pilkington

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 9, 1999No. 98-0512/MCPublished

1Dissent

SULLIVAN, Judge, with whom EFFRON, Judge,

joins (dissenting):

Judicial scrutiny of a pretrial agreement by a trial judge is well established in the military justice system. United States v. Bartley, 47 MJ 182, 186 (1997). Yet, today, the majority allows alteration of the pretrial agreement in this case by means of a post-trial modification without such judicial scrutiny. It admits that the voluntariness of appellant’s post-trial agreement is essential; however, it assesses that voluntariness based only on the parties’ arguments on appeal and the terms of the post-trial agreement itself. In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  5. Cooke v. OrserUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API