Cooke v. Orser
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Judge:
The petitioner comes before this Court seeking extraordinary relief in the form of a writ of mandamus directing the military judge at his court-martial to dismiss the charges1 against him. 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a); Chenoweth v. Van Arsdall, 22 U.S.C.M.A. 183, 188, 46 C.M.R. 183, 188 (1973). He asserts that his prosecution for these offenses is barred by a promise of immunity made by an authority competent to make such a promise or ratified by an authority so empowered. See para. 68A, Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1969 (Revised edition). In the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Murray v. HaldemanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. GrafUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. McClainUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. TreakleU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. LeviteUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.